Respiratory Research (Jun 2022)

Relationship between clinician documented blast exposure and pulmonary function: a retrospective chart review from a national specialty clinic

  • Jennifer H. Therkorn,
  • Sean Hu,
  • Anays M. Sotolongo,
  • Israel C. Christie,
  • Tianshi David Wu,
  • William W. Van Doren,
  • Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja,
  • Nisha Jani,
  • Jacquelyn C. Klein-Adams,
  • Drew A. Helmer,
  • Michael J. Falvo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02071-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Service member exposure to explosive blast overpressure waves is common with considerable attention to traumatic brain injury (TBI) and neuropsychological sequalae. Less is known about the impacts on the respiratory system, particularly long-term effects, despite vulnerability to overpressure. Using a national registry, we previously observed an independent relationship between self-reported blast exposure and respiratory symptoms; however, the impact on objective measures of pulmonary function is poorly understood. Methods 307 Veterans referred to our national specialty center for post-deployment health concerns underwent a comprehensive multi-day evaluation that included complete pulmonary function testing (PFT), occupational and environmental medicine history, neuropsychological or psychological evaluation. We developed an a priori chart abstraction process and template to classify Veterans into blast exposure groups: (1) none, (2) single-mild, or (3) multiple-mild. This template focused primarily on clinician documented notes of blast related TBI that were used as proxy for blast overpressure injury to thorax. PFT variables characterizing flow (FEV1%; %∆FEV1), volume (TLC%), diffusion (DLCO%) and respiratory mechanics (forced oscillometry) were selected for analysis. Results Veterans (40.5 ± 9.7 years; 16.3% female) were referred 8.6 ± 3.6 years after their last deployment and presented with considerable comorbid conditions and health problems (e.g., 62% post-traumatic stress, 55% dyspnea). After chart abstraction, Veterans were assigned to none (n = 208), single mild (n = 52) and multiple mild (n = 47) blast exposure groups. Among the blast exposed, clinicians documented 73.7% were < 50 m from the blast and 40.4% were physically moved by blast. PFT outcome measures were similar across all groups (p value range: 0.10–0.99). Conclusions In this referred sample of deployed Veterans, PFT measures of flow, volume, diffusion, and respiratory mechanics were not associated with clinician documented blast exposure per the retrospective chart abstraction methodology applied. Yet, these clinical findings suggest future research should determine and assess distinction between Veteran recollections of perceived blast experiences versus overpressure wave exposure to the respiratory system.