Frontiers in Genetics (Nov 2021)

Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets

  • Lauren E. Eldred,
  • R. Greg Thorn,
  • David Roy Smith

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.768473
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Simple nucleotide matching identification methods are not as accurate as once thought at identifying environmental fungal sequences. This is largely because of incorrect naming and the underrepresentation of various fungal groups in reference datasets. Here, we explore these issues by examining an environmental metabarcoding dataset of partial large subunit rRNA sequences of Basidiomycota and basal fungi. We employed the simple matching method using the QIIME 2 classifier and the RDP Classifier in conjunction with the latest releases of the SILVA (138.1, 2020) and RDP (11, 2014) reference datasets and then compared the results with a manual phylogenetic binning approach. Of the 71 query sequences tested, 21 and 42% were misidentified using QIIME 2 and the RDP Classifier, respectively. Of these simple matching misidentifications, more than half resulted from the underrepresentation of various groups of fungi in the SILVA and RDP reference datasets. More comprehensive reference datasets with fewer misidentified sequences will increase the accuracy of simple matching identifications. However, we argue that the phylogenetic binning approach is a better alternative to simple matching since, in addition to better accuracy, it provides evolutionary information about query sequences.

Keywords