RMD Open (Jul 2024)

Computable phenotype for real-world, data-driven retrospective identification of relapse in ANCA-associated vasculitis

  • Vladimir Tesar,
  • Cathal Walsh,
  • Conor Judge,
  • John Kelleher,
  • Zdenka Hrušková,
  • Raashid Ahmed Luqmani,
  • Jennifer Scott,
  • Peter A Merkel,
  • Mark A Little,
  • Niall Conlon,
  • Louis Aslett,
  • Arthur White,
  • Julie Power,
  • Matthew A Rutherford,
  • James Ng,
  • Kuruvilla Sebastian,
  • Sorcha O’Brien,
  • Sarah M Moran

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003962
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Objective ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a relapsing-remitting disease, resulting in incremental tissue injury. The gold-standard relapse definition (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, BVAS>0) is often missing or inaccurate in registry settings, leading to errors in ascertainment of this key outcome. We sought to create a computable phenotype (CP) to automate retrospective identification of relapse using real-world data in the research setting.Methods We studied 536 patients with AAV and >6 months follow-up recruited to the Rare Kidney Disease registry (a national longitudinal, multicentre cohort study). We followed five steps: (1) independent encounter adjudication using primary medical records to assign the ground truth, (2) selection of data elements (DEs), (3) CP development using multilevel regression modelling, (4) internal validation and (5) development of additional models to handle missingness. Cut-points were determined by maximising the F1-score. We developed a web application for CP implementation, which outputs an individualised probability of relapse.Results Development and validation datasets comprised 1209 and 377 encounters, respectively. After classifying encounters with diagnostic histopathology as relapse, we identified five key DEs; DE1: change in ANCA level, DE2: suggestive blood/urine tests, DE3: suggestive imaging, DE4: immunosuppression status, DE5: immunosuppression change. F1-score, sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.92), 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99), respectively. Where DE5 was missing, DE2 plus either DE1/DE3 were required to match the accuracy of BVAS.Conclusions This CP accurately quantifies the individualised probability of relapse in AAV retrospectively, using objective, readily accessible registry data. This framework could be leveraged for other outcomes and relapsing diseases.