Some reflections on the Renewal-theory paradox in queueing theory

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis. 1998;11(3):355-368 DOI 10.1155/S104895339800029X

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis

ISSN: 1048-9533 (Print); 1687-2177 (Online)

Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation

LCC Subject Category: Science: Mathematics

 

AUTHORS

Robert B. Cooper (Florida Atlantic University, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Boca Raton 33431-0991, FL, USA)
Shun-Chen Niu (The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Management, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson 75083-0688, TX, USA)
Mandyam M. Srinivasan (The University of Tennessee, Management Science Program, College of Business Admin, Knoxville 37996-0562, TN, USA)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

 

Abstract | Full Text

The classical renewal-theory (waiting time, or inspection) paradox states that the length of the renewal interval that covers a randomly-selected time epoch tends to be longer than an ordinary renewal interval. This paradox manifests itself in numerous interesting ways in queueing theory, a prime example being the celebrated Pollaczek-Khintchine formula for the mean waiting time in the M/G/1 queue. In this expository paper, we give intuitive arguments that “explain” why the renewal-theory paradox is ubiquitous in queueing theory, and why it sometimes produces anomalous results. In particular, we use these intuitive arguments to explain decomposition in vacation models, and to derive formulas that describe some recently-discovered counterintuitive results for polling models, such as the reduction of waiting times as a consequence of forcing the server to set up even when no work is waiting.