Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (Mar 2021)

Higher postoperative plasma EV PD-L1 predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer

  • Guoliang Wang,
  • Feng Li,
  • Gaopeng Li,
  • Ting Liu,
  • Fenqing Chi,
  • Yuqi Jia,
  • Quankai Mu,
  • Keru Qin,
  • Xiaoxia Zhu,
  • Baixue Xu,
  • Guangen Feng,
  • Yuhu Niu,
  • Tao Gong,
  • Hongwei Zhang,
  • Xiushan Dong,
  • Jinfeng Ma,
  • Zefeng Gao,
  • Kai Tao,
  • Baofeng Yu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002218
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Background The satisfactory prognostic indicator of gastric cancer (GC) patients after surgery is still lacking. Perioperative plasma extracellular vesicular programmed cell death ligand-1 (ePD-L1) has been demonstrated as a potential prognosis biomarker in many types of cancers. The prognostic value of postoperative plasma ePD-L1 has not been characterized.Methods We evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative, postoperative and change in plasma ePD-L1, as well as plasma soluble PD-L1, in short-term survival of GC patients after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival model and Cox proportional hazards models for both univariate and multivariate analyzes were used. And the comparison between postoperative ePD-L1 and conventional serum biomarkers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) and CA72-4) in prognostic of GC patients was made.Results The prognostic value of postoperative ePD-L1 is superior to that of preoperative ePD-L1 on GC patients after resection, and also superior to that of conventional serum biomarkers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4). The levels of postoperative ePD-L1 and ePD-L1 change are independent prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence free survival of GC patients. High plasma level of postoperative ePD-L1 correlates significantly with poor survival, while high change in ePD-L1 level brings the significant survival benefit.Conclusions The level of plasma postoperative ePD-L1 could be considered as a candidate prognostic biomarker of GC patients after resection.