Haematologica (Jun 2025)

Revised renal stratification and progression models for predicting long-term renal outcomes in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

  • Muhammad Umaid Rauf,
  • Steven Law,
  • Marisa Santostefano,
  • Philip N. Hawkins,
  • Aviva Petrie,
  • Francesco Cappelli,
  • Federico Perfetto,
  • Yousuf Razvi,
  • Aldostefano Porcari,
  • Sriram Ravichandran,
  • Adam Ioannou,
  • Joshua Bomsztyk,
  • Alessia Argirò,
  • Costanza Gaudio,
  • Elisabetta Antonioli,
  • Alessandro Barilaro,
  • Marco Delsante,
  • Vittorio Di Maso,
  • Maria G. Chiappini,
  • Olabisi Ogunbiyi,
  • Oliver C. Cohen,
  • Ana Martinez-Naharro,
  • Carol Whelan,
  • Helen J. Lachmann,
  • Ashutosh D. Wechalekar,
  • Federico Alberici,
  • Marianna Fontana,
  • Marco Allinovi,
  • Julian D. Gillmore

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287703
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 999, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Renal prognosis in light-chain amyloidosis (AL) is determined by categorizing patients into three renal stages at diagnosis and assessing Renal Response or Renal Progression following chemotherapy after 6 months. We evaluated, in a test (N=1935) cohort of patients with renal AL amyloidosis who were followed for a median of 95 months, a modified 4-stage model where Renal Stage 2 was sub-categorized according to preserved (2A) or reduced (2B) estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). A hybrid model for evaluation of Renal Progression was also introduced, using an eGFR cut-off of 30ml/min/1.73 m2. These models were compared with existing models; namely those of Palladini and Kastritis, and results were validated in a multicenter cohort (N=438). The risk of progression to renal replacement therapy (RRT) increased progressively across all Renal Stages of the revised staging model (Hazard ratio [HR]: 3.25, 5.13, 10.66 for Stages 2A, 2B and 3 respectively vs Stage 1, each p