Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum (Jan 2023)

Patient and Clinician Reported Outcomes of the Inframammary Incision “Short Scar Technique” in Primary Breast Augmentation

  • Paolo Montemurro,
  • Mubashir Cheema,
  • Tommaso Pellegatta,
  • Per Hedén

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojad003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract BackgroundBreast augmentation is a common aesthetic surgery procedure and surgeons are constantly trying to develop techniques that help improve patients' outcome. One of the most important aspects is achieving a favorable scar. The “traditional” breast augmentation scar is in the inframammary fold (IMF), whereas trans-axillary and trans-umbilical approaches have been described as an attempt to move the “location” of the scar and make it less noticeable. Nonetheless, relatively little attention has been paid to improving the IMF scar, which remains the most commonly used scar for silicone implants. ObjectivesThe authors have previously described a technique that uses an insertion sleeve and custom-made retractors to allow implant insertion through a shorter IMF scar. However, at the time, the authors did not evaluate the quality of the scar and patient satisfaction. In this manuscript, the authors describe patient and clinician-reported outcomes for this short scar technique. MethodsAll consecutive female patients, undergoing primary aesthetic breast augmentation with symmetric implants were included in this review. ResultsThree different scar-assessment scales demonstrated good results at 1-year postop, as well as the good correlation between patient-reported and clinician-observed scores. BREAST-Q subscale for overall satisfaction also demonstrated good overall patient satisfaction. ConclusionsBesides providing an added aesthetic value to the result of breast augmentation, a shorter scar may also appeal to patients who are concerned about the size and quality of postoperative scars and like to search for “before and after” pictures prior to scheduling consultations. Level of Evidence: 4