Cancer Medicine (Sep 2023)

Identification of microbial markers associated with lung cancer based on multi‐cohort 16 s rRNA analyses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

  • Wenjie Han,
  • Na Wang,
  • Mengzhen Han,
  • Xiaolin Liu,
  • Tao Sun,
  • Junnan Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6503
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 18
pp. 19301 – 19319

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The relationship between commensal microbiota and lung cancer (LC) has been studied extensively. However, developing replicable microbiological markers for early LC diagnosis across multiple populations has remained challenging. Current studies are limited to a single region, single LC subtype, and small sample size. Therefore, we aimed to perform the first large‐scale meta‐analysis for identifying micro biomarkers for LC screening by integrating gut and respiratory samples from multiple studies and building a machine‐learning classifier. Methods In total, 712 gut and 393 respiratory samples were assessed via 16 s rRNA amplicon sequencing. After identifying the taxa of differential biomarkers, we established random forest models to distinguish between LC populations and normal controls. We validated the robustness and specificity of the model using external cohorts. Moreover, we also used the KEGG database for the predictive analysis of colony‐related functions. Results The α and β diversity indices indicated that LC patients' gut microbiota (GM) and lung microbiota (LM) differed significantly from those of the healthy population. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of effect size (LEfSe) helped us identify the top‐ranked biomarkers, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Escherichia, in two microbial niches. The area under the curve values of the diagnostic model for the two sites were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. KEGG enrichment analysis also revealed significant differences in microbiota‐associated functions between cancer‐affected and healthy individuals that were primarily associated with metabolic disturbances. Conclusions GM and LM profiles were significantly altered in LC patients, compared to healthy individuals. We identified the taxa of biomarkers at the two loci and constructed accurate diagnostic models. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of LC‐specific microbiological markers in multiple populations and contributes to the early diagnosis and screening of LC.

Keywords