International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Apr 2023)

Determining the screening frequency for sexually transmitted infections for people who use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Cham-mill Kim,
  • Victor Zhao,
  • Maeve Brito De Mello,
  • Rachel Baggaley,
  • Cheryl C. Johnson,
  • Erica Spielman,
  • Christopher K. Fairley,
  • Lei Zhang,
  • Henry de Vries,
  • Jeffrey Klausner,
  • Rui Zhao,
  • Jason J. Ong

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 129
pp. 181 – 187

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Although the World Health Organization recommends ‘frequent’ screening of sexually transmitted infections (STI) for people who use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, there is no evidence for optimal frequency. Methods: We searched five databases and used random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates of STI test positivity. We narratively synthesized data on secondary outcomes, including adherence to recommended STI screening frequency and changes in STI epidemiology. Results: Of 7477 studies, we included 38 for the meta-analysis and 11 for secondary outcomes. With 2-3 monthly STI screening, the pooled positivity was 0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.25) for chlamydia, 0.17 (95% CI: 0.12-0.22) for gonorrhea, and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.08) for syphilis. For chlamydia and gonorrhea, the positivity was approximately 50% and 75% lower, respectively, in studies that screened 4-6 monthly vs 2-3 monthly. There was no significant difference in the positivity for syphilis in studies that screened 4-6 monthly compared to 2-3 monthly. Adherence of clients to recommended screening frequency varied significantly (39-94%) depending on population and country. Modeling studies suggest more frequent STI screening could reduce incidence. Conclusion: Although more frequent STI screening could reduce delayed diagnoses and incidence, there remain significant knowledge gaps regarding the optimal STI screening frequency.

Keywords