Hysteresis data of planar perovskite solar cells fabricated with different solvents
You-Hyun Seo,
Eun-Chong Kim,
Se-Phin Cho,
Seok-Soon Kim,
Seok-In Na
Affiliations
You-Hyun Seo
Professional Graduate School of Flexible and Printable Electronics and Polymer Materials Fusion Research Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Republic of Korea
Eun-Chong Kim
Professional Graduate School of Flexible and Printable Electronics and Polymer Materials Fusion Research Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Republic of Korea
Se-Phin Cho
Professional Graduate School of Flexible and Printable Electronics and Polymer Materials Fusion Research Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Republic of Korea
Seok-Soon Kim
Department of Nano & Chemical Engineering, Kunsan National University, 290-2, Miryong-dong, Gunsan-si, Jeollabuk-do 573-701, Republic of Korea
Seok-In Na
Professional Graduate School of Flexible and Printable Electronics and Polymer Materials Fusion Research Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 561-756, Republic of Korea; Corresponding author. Fax: +82 62 715 2304.
In this data article, we introduced the hysteresis of planar perovskite solar cells (PSCs) fabricated using dimethylformamide (DMF), gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), DMF-DMSO, GBL-DMSO and NMP-DMSO as perovskite precursor solutions according to different scan directions, sweep times, and current stability. The hysteresis analyses of the planar PSCs prepared with a glass-ITO /NiOX/perovskite /PC61BM/BCP/Ag configuration were measured with Keithley 2400 source meter unit under 100 mW/cm2 (AM 1.5 G). The data collected in this article compares the hysteresis of PSCs with different solvents and is directly related to our research article “High-Performance Planar Perovskite Solar Cells: Influence of Solvent upon Performance” (You-Hyun Seo et al., 2017 [1]).
