Bioengineering & Translational Medicine (Mar 2023)

Electrostatic potential difference between tumor and paratumor regulates cancer stem cell behavior and prognose tumor spread

  • Haoran Zhao,
  • Weijie Zhang,
  • Xiaowei Tang,
  • Edgar A. Galan,
  • Yinheng Zhu,
  • Gan Sang,
  • Davit Khutsishvili,
  • Honghui Zheng,
  • Shaohua Ma

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10399
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Tumor spread is responsible for most deaths related to cancer. Increasing the accuracy of cancer prognosis is critical to reducing the high mortality rates in cancer patients. Here, we report that the electrostatic potential difference (EPD) between tumor and its paratumor tissue is a prognostic marker for tumor spread. This finding is concluded from the patient‐specific EPD values and clinical observation. The electrostatic potential values were measured on tissue cryosections from 51 patients using Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). A total of ~44% (15/34) patients of Vtumor–paratumor > 0 were featured with tumor spread, whereas only ~18% (2/11) patients of Vtumor–paratumor < 0 had tumor spread. Next, we found the increased enrichment of cancer stem cells in paratumors with lower electrostatic potentials using immunofluorescence imaging, which suggested the attribution of tumor spread to the galvanotaxis of cancer stem cells (CSCs) toward lower potential. The findings were finally validated in breast and lung spheroid models composed of differentiated cancer cells and cancer stem cells at the ratio of 1:1 and embedded in Matrigel dopped with negative‐, neutral‐ and positive‐charged polymers and CSCs prefer to spread out of spheroids to lower electrostatic potential sites. This work may inspire the development of diagnostic and prognostic strategies targeting at tissue EPDs and CSCs for tumor therapy.

Keywords