DEN Open (Apr 2022)

Tardive peritonitis after the endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastorostomy: A case report

  • Yukitaka Yasuhara,
  • Nana Shimamoto,
  • Shintaro Tsukinaga,
  • Masayuki Kato,
  • Kazuki Sumiyama

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.77
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) has become popular as a new drainage technique for malignant biliary strictures. Although EUS‐BD has been reported to show high technical and clinical success rates, the rate of adverse events is 15%. In particular, peritonitis, which is generally caused by bile leakage from the aspiration side during the procedure and occurs within a few days after EUS‐BD, needs to be considered as it can be fatal. In the present case, a jaundiced patient presented with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Due to duodenal invasion, we performed EUS‐guided hepaticogastrostomy for biliary drainage. After the procedure, jaundice improved, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed only a small amount of air in the intrahepatic bile duct. However, 7 days after the procedure, the patient developed fever, and clinical findings indicated peritonitis. Abdominal CT showed food in the stomach accompanied by the appearance of perihepatic free air, with increased air in the intrahepatic bile duct. The duodenal stent insertion settled the peritonitis and improved the perihepatic free air and the air in the intrahepatic bile duct through the discharge of food from the stomach. To date, no case of tardive peritonitis associated with air leakage after EUS‐BD has been reported. We noted that even if there was no evidence of bile leakage after EUS‐BD, the possibility of tardive peritonitis due to gradual air leakage from the stent implantation side of the stomach should be considered, and careful follow‐up is needed.

Keywords