Soil ecological risk assessment of ten industrial areas in China based on the TRIAD and VIKOR methods

Abstract

The TRIAD approach is widely used as a scientific methodology available to deal with site-specific contamination scenarios. In this study, a soil environmental risk assessments (SERA) of ten industrial sites in China was conducted by ranking risks across multiple sites based on the TRIAD method, and attempted to provide an alternative method for risk ranking, the VIKOR method, when reference screening values for assessing individual indicators are unavailable. The VIKOR method was developed to address ranking and selection problems in multi-criteria decision-making, particularly in complex decision environments. The present assessments analyzed 33 chemical analysis indicators, 14 ecotoxicological indicators, and 5 ecological indicators related to soil microbial diversity, subsequently compared and discuss the differences in risk ranking results obtained using the two methods. The results of the TRIAD approach showed that six sites (including F, G, E, B, J and I) were ranked high in the risk order, which were in the moderate-risk range (Integrated risk value, 0.5–0.75). While the results of the VIKOR method showed that four sites (including F, G, H, and E) were ranked high in the risk order, followed by another four sites (including D, A, B, and C). Although there were differences in the assessment results, both methods consistently identified three sites (including F, G, and E) with relatively higher risks. The results indicated that when the TRIAD method is not applicable in special cases, the VIKOR comprehensive evaluation can be used to infer the relative ecological risk of the assessed site.

Keywords

• Ecological risk assessment
• Ecotoxicology
• Soil microbial diversity
• TRIAD
• VIKOR method
• Random Forest