Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia ()

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Tibial Fixation Methods in the Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament in Swine Bones

  • Rogério Nascimento Costa,
  • Rubens Rosso Nadal,
  • Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin,
  • Osmar Valadão Lopes Junior,
  • Leandro de Freitas Spinelli,
  • Charles Leonardo Israel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.001
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 54, no. 2
pp. 183 – 189

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective The present study aims to evaluate different methods of tibial fixation in the reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). In addition, the present paper aims to compare the effectiveness of these methods and theirmechanisms of failure in swine knees. Methods A total of 40 freshly frozen swine limbs were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens, according to the tibial fixation technique used. In group A, the tibial fixation of the tendon graft wasmade through an anchor passing the graft. In group B, the tibial fixation was performed through a metal interference screw in a single bone tunnel. In group C, the tibial fixation included an anchor associated with a tendinous suture (but not with a wire crossing the tendon). In group D, two confluent bony tunnels were drilled and combined with an interference screw in one of them. Results The lowest mean force (70.56 N) was observed in group A, and the highest mean force (244.85 N) was observed in group B; the mean values in the other 2 groups ranged from 171.68 N (group C) to 149.43 N (group D). Considering the margin of error (5%), there was a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion Fixation with an interference screw in a single tunnel bone showed the highest tensile strength among the evaluated techniques.

Keywords