Maximising the First-Year Experience through the Incorporation of Generic Skills in a Medical Curriculum at the University of the Free State

Journal of Student Affairs in Africa. 2018;6(1) DOI 10.24085/jsaa.v6i1.3067

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Journal of Student Affairs in Africa

ISSN: 2311-1771 (Print); 2307-6267 (Online)

Publisher: Journal of Student Affairs in Africa

Society/Institution: University of the Western Cape

LCC Subject Category: Education: Special aspects of education

Country of publisher: South Africa

Language of fulltext: English

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS

Mpho Priscilla Jama (Head: Division Student Learning and Development, Office of the Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 7 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

The highest attrition rates occur among first-year students. Universities have designed different curricular programmes, such as the development of generic skills, to address this challenge. In the medical school at the University of the Free State in South Africa, these skills were incorporated in the MBChB curriculum as an eight credit-bearing module in 2000 and later increased to 12 credits in 2009. To date, the effectiveness of this first-year module in equipping students with generic skills was last determined in 2002. The aim of this research was to determine the perceptions of first‑year students regarding the effectiveness of this module in equipping them with generic skills. A questionnaire survey was distributed to 596 first-year medical students each year from 2013 to 2016. A focus group discussion (FGD) was held with 13 students who failed the first year of study in 2016 and had to repeat in 2017. According to the results, most students had a positive perception about the structure and organisation as well as the benefits of the module. However, from the questionnaire results, the overall rating of the effectiveness of the module was not very positive, with 35% of students rating it effective, 45% rating it relatively effective and 20% rating it not effective. However, during the FGD, seven (54%) of the 13 students rated it effective. In the qualitative statements of the questionnaire, a common comment related to the poor rating was about the unnecessary long hours in some sessions. Other comments from the questionnaire were medically related, with some students suggesting more practical and clinical demonstrations. During the FGD, students could not understand why their peers needed practical demonstrations in the first year. The incorporation of generic skills should be context- and discipline-specific and students should be “re-equipped” with certain skills during different stages of the curriculum.