Journal of Patient Experience (Dec 2022)

Self-reported Impact of the Early 2020 COVID-19 Crisis on the Healthcare Pathway During and After Lockdown in Patients With Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Practical Survey

  • Jessica Nasseh MD,
  • Céline Podevin MMed,
  • Camille Ternynck PhD,
  • Hélène Zephir MD, PhD,
  • Jean-Guillaume Letarouilly MD,
  • René-Marc Flipo MD, PhD,
  • Maria Nachury MD,
  • Cécile Chenivesse MD, PhD,
  • Eric Hachulla MD, PhD,
  • David Launay MD, PhD,
  • Delphine Staumont-Salle MD, PhD,
  • Frédéric Dezoteux MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221143736
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Global lockdown in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented experience. We report here the results of an anonymous questionnaire-based survey on the healthcare and control of chronic IMIDs (chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases) within the IMMINENT network during the French lockdown (March 17, 2020-May 11, 2020) and the 2-month period following the end of the lockdown (July 11, 2020). Methods: Two anonymous questionnaires were sent by email to 4500 patients who were followed in a university hospital for an IMID in the departments of gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, pneumology, neurology, and internal medicine. Results: A total of 921/4500 (20.46%) responded to the first survey (impact of the lockdown), and 553/4500 (12.28%) to the second (impact at 2-months post-lockdown). Concerning the impact of the lockdown, 420/915 (45.9%) reported affected follow-up. Similarly, after the lockdown, 248/544 (45.6%) declared a negative impact on their follow-up. The repartition by departments of patients’ perception of an altered follow-up during ( P = .72) and at the end of the lockdown ( P = .77) was not statistically different. Our study highlighted the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the restriction measures implemented on the self-reported impact felt by patients on the follow-up of their chronic IMIDs without significant differences among all departments. Conclusion: Our study is original by showing that patients, whatever the type of IMID, shared this same negative perception. This transdisciplinary study demonstrated the importance of a collaborative network among all departments.