Journal of Dairy Science (Sep 2024)

Validity of luminometry and bacteriological tests for diagnosing intramammary infection at dry-off in dairy cows

  • J. Denis-Robichaud,
  • N. Barbeau-Grégoire,
  • M.-L. Gauthier,
  • S. Dufour,
  • J.-P. Roy,
  • S. Buczinski,
  • J. Dubuc

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 107, no. 9
pp. 7221 – 7229

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the validity of laboratory culture, Petrifilm and Tri-Plate on-farm culture systems, as well as luminometry to correctly identify IMI at dry-off in dairy cows, considering all tests to be imperfect. From September 2020 until December 2021, we collected composite milk samples from cows before dry-off and divided them into 4 aliquots for luminometry, Petrifilm (aerobic count), Tri-Plate, and laboratory culture tests. We assessed multiple thresholds of relative light units (RLU) for luminometry, and we used thresholds of ≥100 cfu/mL for the laboratory culture, ≥50 cfu/mL for Petrifilm, and ≥1 cfu for Tri-Plate tests. We fitted Bayesian latent class analysis models to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test to identify IMI, with 95% credibility interval (BCI). Using different prevalence measures (0.30, 0.50, and 0.70), we calculated the predictive values (PV) and misclassification cost terms (MCT) at different false negative-to-false-positive ratios (FN:FP). A total of 333 cows were enrolled in the study from one commercial Holstein herd. The validity of the luminometry was poor for all thresholds, with an Se of 0.51 (95% BCI = 0.43–0.59) and Sp of 0.38 (95% BCI = 0.26–0.50) when using a threshold of ≥150 RLU. The laboratory culture had an Se of 0.93 (95% BCI = 0.85–0.98) and Sp of 0.69 (95% BCI = 0.49–0.89); the Petrifilm had an Se of 0.91 (95% BCI = 0.80–0.98) and Sp of 0.71 (95% BCI = 0.51–0.90); and the Tri-Plate had an Se of 0.65 (95% BCI = 0.53–0.82) and Sp of 0.85 (95% BCI = 0.66–0.97). Bacteriological tests had good PV, with comparable positive PV for all 3 tests, but lower negative PV for the Tri-Plate compared with the laboratory culture and the Petrifilm. For a prevalence of IMI of 0.30, all 3 tests had similar MCT, but for prevalence of 0.50 and 0.70, the Tri-Plate had higher MCT in scenarios where leaving a cow with IMI untreated is considered to have greater detrimental effects than treating a healthy cow (i.e., FN:FP of 3:1). Our results showed that the bacteriological tests have adequate validity to diagnose IMI at dry-off, but luminometry does not. We concluded that although luminometry is not useful to identify IMI at dry-off, the Petrifilm and Tri-Plate tests performed similarly to laboratory culture, depending on the prevalence and importance of the FP and FN results.

Keywords