Bioscience Journal (Aug 2022)

Surface roughness evaluation and whitening efficiency on tooth enamel after using whitening toothpaste: a randomized double-blinded study

  • Erick Kamiya Coppini,
  • Josué Junior Araújo Pierote,
  • Lúcia Trazzi Prieto,
  • João Victor Frazão Câmara,
  • Isabel Ferreira Barbosa,
  • Gisele Damiana da Silveira Pereira,
  • Justine Monteiro Monnerat Tinoco,
  • Renato Feres de Carvalho Vianna,
  • Sonia Groisman,
  • Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias,
  • Debora Alves Nunes Leite Lima,
  • Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar,
  • Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-59876
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 38
pp. e38056 – e38056

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this randomized double-blinded study was to evaluate the enamel surface roughness and color change after one month of whitening toothpaste use and the color stability obtained 1 month after its interruption. 30 volunteers were divided into 3 groups (n = 10) corresponding to the dentifrices: 1) Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint (TD) (Control), 2) Colgate Luminous White (LW) and 3) Sensodyne Whitening Extra Fresh (SB). The volunteers were impression with addition silicone to obtain an epoxy resin replica of the upper central incisor for the initial surface roughness evaluation using a profilometer and the initial color of the incisors and canines was evaluated with a spectrophotometer after one week of wash-out. After 1 month, the color of the central incisors and canines was measured again, and the volunteers were molded to obtain a second replica to the final roughness analysis. Data were submitted to ANOVA-one way (p≤0.05). The results showed that there was no statistical difference between the dentifrices for color difference and surface roughness for all the studied conditions. It was possible to conclude that the whitening dentifrices used in this study were not able to alter the initial color of the teeth and did not cause changes in the surface roughness of enamel.

Keywords