Buildings (Feb 2024)

Effects of Prestressing Magnitude and Position on Seismic Performance of Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Beams

  • Dong Chen,
  • Bin Zeng,
  • Qing Xu,
  • Xiaoda Xu,
  • Man Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020431
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. 431

Abstract

Read online

To study the effects of the jacking stress level, height and strength ratio of the prestress tendons (λ) on the seismic performance of unbonded prestressed concrete (UPC) beams, six UPC beams and one reinforced concrete (RC) beam were tested under cyclic loads. The hysteretic characteristics, skeleton curves, ductility properties, energy dissipation capacity, strain distribution of reinforcement and self-centering capability of the specimens were studied and discussed. Numerical parameter analysis was also carried out by using OpenSees. The results indicate that three failure modes of UPC beams under cyclic loading were observed, namely the tension-failure mode involving a broken rebar, the compression-failure mode involving concrete crushing and the balanced failure. By considering the influence of the prestress position and magnitude, the modified reinforcing index ω was proposed to determine the failure mode. The ω is suggested to be less than 0.3 to ensure sufficient ductility. The effective stress level is linearly and positively related to the stiffness from cracking to yield Kcr and the ultimate bearing capacity of the UPC beam under cyclic loading. The stiffness of the UPC beam is slightly larger than that of the RC beam before yielding, and significantly greater than that of the RC beam after yielding. Due to the large strength reserve after yielding, the integrated seismic performance of the UPC beam is similar to that of the RC beam. When the λ was unchanged, the increase in the relative height of the prestressed tendons αh is beneficial for the overall performance factor F, ductility and crack control. The stiffness degradation performance depends on the λ but is independent of the αh. The total energy dissipation of the non-tensioned UPC specimen was 59% higher than that of the RC beam. The cumulative total energy dissipation of the tensioned UPC specimen was only 13% lower than that of the RC beam with the same number of cycles, indicating that the UPC specimen had a considerable energy dissipation capacity.

Keywords