Remote Sensing (Jan 2024)
Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Network Interpolating and Denoising Seismic Signals Simultaneously
Abstract
In light of the challenging conditions of exploration environments coupled with escalating exploration expenses, seismic data acquisition frequently entails the capturing of signals entangled amidst diverse noise interferences and instances of data loss. The unprocessed state of these seismic signals significantly jeopardizes the interpretative phase. Evidently, the integration of attention mechanisms and the utilization of generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as prominent techniques within signal processing owing to their adeptness in discerning intricate global dependencies. Our research introduces a pioneering approach for reconstructing and denoising seismic signals, amalgamating the principles of self-attention and generative adversarial networks—hereafter referred to as SAGAN. Notably, the incorporation of the self-attention mechanism into the GAN framework facilitates an enhanced capacity for both the generator and discriminator to emulate meaningful spatial interactions. Subsequently, leveraging the feature map generated by the self-attention mechanism within the GAN structure enables the interpolation and denoising of seismic signals. Rigorous experimentation substantiates the efficacy of SAGAN in simultaneous signal interpolation and denoising. Initially, we benchmarked SAGAN against prominent methods such as UNet, CNN, and Wavelet for the concurrent interpolation and denoising of two-dimensional seismic signals manifesting varying levels of damage. Subsequently, this methodology was extended to encompass three-dimensional seismic data. Notably, performance metrics reveal SAGAN’s superiority over comparative methods. Specifically, the quantitative tables exhibit SAGAN’s pronounced advantage, with a 3.46% increase in PSNR value over UNet and an impressive 11.90% surge compared to Wavelet. Moreover, the RMSE values affirm SAGAN’s robust performance, showcasing an 11.54% reduction in comparison to UNet and an impressive 29.27% decrement relative to Wavelet, hence unequivocally establishing the SAGAN method as a preeminent choice for seismic signal recovery.
Keywords