Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Nov 2019)

The Impact of Temporal Artery Biopsy at a UK Tertiary Plastic Surgery Unit

  • Bryan J. W. Chew, MD,
  • Ankur Khajuria, MD, MRCS (Eng),
  • Javier Ibanez, MD, FRCS (Plast)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002541
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 11
p. e2541

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Guidelines recommend temporal artery biopsy (TAB) for patients suspected of having giant cell arteritis (GCA). We evaluated the impact of TAB on the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected GCA at a tertiary plastic surgery unit. Methods:. A retrospective review of all TAB procedures performed at our centre over 7 years was performed. One hundred and one patients were included in the study. Patients were classified into 3 diagnostic groups: confirmed (positive TAB), presumed (negative TAB with high clinical suspicion) and unlikely (negative TAB with low clinical suspicion). The clinical presentation and management for each group were compared. Results:. The average American College of Rheumatology (ACR) score was 3.07. The number of patients with an ACR score of ≥3 before TAB was 72 (71.3%) and remained the same after TAB. The number of patients who remained on steroid therapy was lower in the group with an unlikely diagnosis of GCA compared to the group with a confirmed diagnosis (p0.05). Conclusions:. This study found a significant difference in steroid treatment between those with confirmed GCA and those where the diagnosis was unlikely showing that TAB may support decisions regarding steroid therapy. However, TAB was inappropriately requested for patients whose pre-TAB ACR score was ≥3 as this score is sufficient for the diagnosis of GCA. Therefore, the use of TAB should be limited to cases of diagnostic uncertainty.