Current Urology (Sep 2023)

Feasibility of cabazitaxel in octogenarian prostate cancer patients

  • Paolo Tralongo,
  • Sebastiano Bordonaro,
  • Giuseppe Di Lorenzo,
  • Ugo De Giorgi,
  • Nicolò Borsellino,
  • Gaetano Facchini,
  • Sabrina Rossetti,
  • Giuseppe Fornarini,
  • Vito Longo,
  • Antonino Carmelo Tralongo,
  • Francesca Caspani,
  • Massimiliano Spada,
  • Nicola Calvani,
  • Paolo Carlini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000081
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 3
pp. 153 – 158

Abstract

Read online

Abstract. Background. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabazitaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients aged ≥80 years, we performed a retrospective study on a sample of patients from 11 Italian cancer centers. Materials and methods. Fifty-seven patients aged ≥80 years were treated with cabazitaxel after previous failure with docetaxel; 39 completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment questionnaire (34 fit and 5 vulnerable) and 8 patients (14%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2, while most had a PS of 0–1 (86%). Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2 in 30 (52%) patients and 20 mg/m2 or adapted schedules in 27 (48%) patients. These schedules were adopted mainly in patients ≥85 years (75%), with a PS ≥2 (87.5%), and those classified as vulnerable (100%). Results. The duration of treatment was 4.8 months and was comparable in all subgroups; disease control rate was reported in 36 patients (63%); prostate-specific antigen response was recorded in 18 patients (31.5%). Median overall survival was 13.1 months regardless of age (<85/≥85 years), but overall survival was reduced in vulnerable (7.2 months) and PS ≥ 2 patients (6.8 months). The most frequently documented grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (10.5%). Six patients (10.5%) dropped out due to severe toxicity. Conclusions. Octogenarian patients can be treated with cabazitaxel with reduced doses or alternative schedules that are associated with less toxicity and fewer treatment interruptions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment could facilitate more appropriate patient selection.