Biomimetic Capabilities of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Restorations on Posterior Teeth: Evaluation of the Long-Term Survival Rate—A 10-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

In contemporary dental practice, clinicians have a variety of materials and options for restoring single teeth compromised by carious or non-carious diseases. According to studies and new concepts in biomimetic restorative dentistry, indirect ceramic restorations will play an increasingly important role in daily practice. We follow up and evaluate clinically three times over a 10-year period on eighty-six indirect restorations (n = 86) of lithium disilicate e.Max Press (Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in 32 patients. Restorations are evaluated in the 2nd, 5th, and 10th years after the fixation. Four of the restorations studied (n = 86) had to be replaced at year 5 follow-up because of fracture (failure rate: 4.65%; Kaplan–Maier). There are no restorations with bulky, cohesive fractures. Lithium disilicate ceramic restorations provide a good treatment alternative for a 5- to 10-year period of observation, and they can be successfully applied in dental practice in 91.73% to 98.84% of cases. Advancements in digital dentistry, including the use of intraoral scanners and CAD/CAM technology, are set to further refine the precision and efficiency of indirect restorations for distal teeth, enabling quicker turnaround times and improved fit. Additionally, ongoing developments in biomaterials promise to enhance the durability and biocompatibility of these restorations, potentially leading to better long-term success rates and patient satisfaction. The goal of this clinical study was to look at how well biomimetic ceramic overlays and onlays made of lithium disilicate held onto teeth with a IV-generation adhesive system for 10 years. The study also looked at how well the edges of the teeth adjusted and how strong the teeth were overall.

Keywords

• biomimetic
• ceramic restorations
• dental restoration failure
• e.Max Press
• lithium disilicate
• longevity