Can using a pre-trained deep learning model as the feature extractor in the bag-of-deep-visual-words model always improve image classification accuracy?

Abstract

This article investigates whether higher classification accuracy can always be achieved by utilizing a pre-trained deep learning model as the feature extractor in the Bag-of-Deep-Visual-Words (BoDVW) classification model, as opposed to directly using the new classification layer of the pre-trained model for classification. Considering the multiple factors related to the feature extractor -such as model architecture, fine-tuning strategy, number of training samples, feature extraction method, and feature encoding method-we investigate these factors through experiments and then provide detailed answers to the question. In our experiments, we use five feature encoding methods: hard-voting, soft-voting, locally constrained linear coding, super vector coding, and fisher vector (FV). We also employ two popular feature extraction methods: one (denoted as Ext-DFs(CP)) uses a convolutional or non-global pooling layer, and another (denoted as Ext-DFs(FC)) uses a fully-connected or global pooling layer. Three pre-trained models-VGGNet-16, ResNext-50(32×4d), and Swin-B-are utilized as feature extractors. Experimental results on six datasets (15-Scenes, TF-Flowers, MIT Indoor-67, COVID-19 CXR, NWPU-RESISC45, and Caltech-101) reveal that compared to using the pre-trained model with only the new classification layer re-trained for classification, employing it as the feature extractor in the BoDVW model improves the accuracy in 35 out of 36 experiments when using FV. With Ext-DFs(CP), the accuracy increases by 0.13% to 8.43% (averaged at 3.11%), and with Ext-DFs(FC), it increases by 1.06% to 14.63% (averaged at 5.66%). Furthermore, when all layers of the pre-trained model are fine-tuned and used as the feature extractor, the results vary depending on the methods used. If FV and Ext-DFs(FC) are used, the accuracy increases by 0.21% to 5.65% (averaged at 1.58%) in 14 out of 18 experiments. Our results suggest that while using a pre-trained deep learning model as the feature extractor does not always improve classification accuracy, it holds great potential as an accuracy improvement technique.