Scientific Reports (Jul 2023)

Exploration of sepsis assisting parameters in hospital autopsied-patients: a prospective study

  • Kunihiro Inai,
  • Shohei Higuchi,
  • Akihiro Shimada,
  • Kyoko Hisada,
  • Yukio Hida,
  • Satomi Hatta,
  • Fumihiro Kitano,
  • Miyuki Uno,
  • Haruka Matsukawa,
  • Sakon Noriki,
  • Hiromichi Iwasaki,
  • Hironobu Naiki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37752-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Although Sepsis-3 doesn’t require evidence of bacteremia to diagnose sepsis, clinicians often want to identify the causative pathogen at autopsy. In principle, if the blood cultures are the same at ante- and postmortem, the cause of death is obvious. However, interpretations of postmortem blood cultures are often difficult due to discordance, negativity, mixed infection, and contamination, of pathogens occupying ≥ 50% of the tests. To increase specificity identifying agonal phase sepsis in the situations where blood cultures are discordant, multiple or negative at postmortem, we established a scoring system using blood cultures, procalcitonin (PCN) showing highest sensitivity and specificity for postmortem serum, and bone marrow polyhemophagocytosis (PHP). Histological sepsis showed significantly higher levels of culture score (2.3 ± 1.5 vs. 0.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), PHP score (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), and PCN score (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6, p < 0.01) than non-septic patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that estimation of three scores was the most reliable indicator for recognizing agonal phase sepsis. These findings suggest that the combination of these three inspections enables to determine the pathological diagnoses of sepsis even it is not obvious by discordant, mixed or negative blood cultures.