Breast Cancer Research (Dec 2023)

Effect of histological breast cancer subtypes invasive lobular versus non-special type on survival in early intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma: results from the SUCCESS trials

  • Davut Dayan,
  • Stefan Lukac,
  • Brigitte Rack,
  • Florian Ebner,
  • Visnja Fink,
  • Elena Leinert,
  • Kristina Veselinovic,
  • Sabine Schütze,
  • Ziad El Taie,
  • Wolfgang Janni,
  • Thomas W. P. Friedl

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01750-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) have different histological features compared to non-special type carcinomas (NST), but the effect of histological subtypes on survival is controversial. In this study, we compared clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes between ILC and NST based on a large pooled data set from three adjuvant breast cancer trials (SUCCESS A, B, and C) and investigated a potential differential effect of recurrence risk related to nodal stage on survival. Methods From 2005 to 2017, the large randomized controlled SUCCESS A, B, and C trials enrolled 8190 patients with primary, intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and endocrine and/or HER2-targeted treatment was given where appropriate. Survival outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed using log-rank tests as well as univariable and adjusted multivariable Cox regression models. Results In the SUCCESS trials, 6284 patients had NST and 952 had ILC. The median follow-up time was 64 months. ILC patients were older, more likely to receive mastectomy, and more likely to have larger tumor sizes, lymph node infiltration, hormone receptor-positive, HER2neu-negative, and luminal A-like tumors than NST patients. In the overall cohort, no significant differences between ILC and NST were detectable regarding the four survival endpoints, with hazard ratios obtained in adjusted multivariable cox regressions of 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–1.21, p = 0.743) for DFS, 1.13 (95% CI 0.85–1.50, p = 0.414) for OS, 1.21 (95% CI 0.89–1.66, p = 0.229) for BCSS, and 0.95 (95% CI 0.73–1.24, p = 0.689) for DDFS. However, a differential effect of nodal stage on survival was observed, with better survival for ILC patients with pN0/pN1 tumors and worse survival for ILC patients with pN2/pN3 tumors compared to NST patients. Conclusions Our results revealed that ILC was associated with worse survival compared to NST for patients at high risk of recurrence due to advanced lymph node infiltration. These findings should be taken into account for treatment decisions and monitoring.

Keywords