Postoperative recurrence of clinical early-stage non-small cell lung cancers: a comparison between solid and subsolid nodules

Abstract

Abstract Background For subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), solid size (SS), which is the maximal diameter of the solid component, correlates more accurately with tumor prognosis than the total size, which is the maximal diameter of the entire tumor, including ground-glass opacity. We reviewed the propriety of the TNM staging based on the SS for early-stage NSCLCs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiological reports, clinical records, and pathological reports of NSCLC cases in our hospital between 2010 and 2013, and clinical stage (c-Stage) 0 and I tumors were selected. Disease-free survival (DFS), based on survival analysis, was used to assess the tumor characteristics that predicted the prognosis. Results A total of 247 NSCLC diagnoses in 231 patients (88 women and 143 men; age, 67 ± 7 years) were included in our cohort. They were classified into solid (n = 131) and subsolid (n = 116) nodules. The DFS curves indicated that prognosis was significantly worse in the following order: c-Stage 0, c-Stage IA, and c-Stage IB tumors (p = 0.016). Patients with solid nodules showed a significantly worse prognosis than patients with subsolid nodules (p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that the significant predictive factors for DFS were c-Stage (hazard ratio, 1.600; p = 0.020) and solid nodules (hazard ratio, 3.077; p = 0.031). Conclusions For early-stage NSCLCs, the c-Stage based on the SS in subsolid nodules was useful for predicting postoperative DFS. In addition, whether nodules were solid or subsolid was another independent prognostic factor.

Keywords

• Non-small cell lung cancer
• Computed tomography
• Prognostic factors
• TNM classification
• Solid size