BMC Gastroenterology (Oct 2021)

Can the simplified magnetic resonance index of activity be used to evaluate the degree of activity in Crohn's disease?

  • Yongli Tao,
  • Hong Li,
  • Han Xu,
  • Wen Tang,
  • Guohua Fan,
  • Xiaochun Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01987-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and aims A simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIAs) was recently proposed. Our aim was to verify whether MaRIAs can accurately assess the activity degree of CD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the MRI, ileocolonoscopy, fecal calprotectin (FC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) data of 93 CD patients. With the SES-CD as the gold standard, MaRIAs’ accuracy, the correlation of MaRIAs and SES-CD, FC, ESR, CRP, and interevaluator reliability were assessed. Results MaRIAs ≥ 1 detected segments with active CD with 90.80% specificity and 81.37% sensitivity (area under the curve was 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.94). MaRIAs score of 2 or more detected severe lesions with 88.89% specificity and 95.12% sensitivity (AUC was 0.96, 95% confidence interval was 0.94–0.98). The MaRIAs score showed a high correlation with the SES-CD in the terminal ileum, transverse colon, right colon, and left colon (r = 0.85, 0.91, 0.88, 0.86, P < 0.001) and a moderate correlation with the SES-CD in the rectum (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). The global MaRIAs score was highly correlated with the global SES-CD (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). The global MaRIAs score was positively correlated with the fecal calprotectin (FC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0.77, r = 0.64, and r = 0.68). The intragroup correlation coefficient (ICC) of the two physicians was nice in the terminal ileum, the right colon, the transverse colon, the left colon and was moderately good in the rectum. Conclusion MaRIAs can accurately evaluate the disease activity level of CD and are highly correlated with SES-CD and biomarkers. The interrater reliability of the two physicians was moderately good to nice.

Keywords