Diagnostics (Sep 2024)

Comparative Performance of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Primary Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy

  • Guido Rovera,
  • Serena Grimaldi,
  • Marco Oderda,
  • Giancarlo Marra,
  • Giorgio Calleris,
  • Giuseppe Carlo Iorio,
  • Marta Falco,
  • Cristiano Grossi,
  • Roberto Passera,
  • Giuseppe Campidonico,
  • Maria Luce Mangia,
  • Désirée Deandreis,
  • Riccardo Faletti,
  • Umberto Ricardi,
  • Paolo Gontero,
  • Silvia Morbelli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171964
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 17
p. 1964

Abstract

Read online

This prospective study aimed to (1) compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with respect to conventional imaging (computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS)) in the primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients and (2) validate PSMA-PET/CT accuracy in pelvic nodal staging in comparison with postoperative histopathology and assess PSMA-PET/CT’s impact on patient management. Sixty castration-sensitive high-risk (ISUP 4–5 and/or PSA > 20 ng/mL and/or cT3) PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy were enrolled (median PSA 10.10 [IQR: 6.22–17.95] ng/mL). PSMA-PET/CT, compared with CT, identified nodal (N) and/or distant metastases (M1) in 56.7% (34/60) vs. 13.3% (8/60) (p p p = 0.03), M1b 23.3% vs. 1.7% (p n = 32 patients), the per-patient accuracy of PSMA-PET/TC for detecting pelvic nodal metastases was 90.6%. Overall, the above evidence supports the use of PSMA-PET/CT in the diagnostic workup of high-risk prostate cancer staging.

Keywords