Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Dec 2017)

Pacemaker‐Mediated Programmable Hypertension Control Therapy

  • Petr Neuzil,
  • Béla Merkely,
  • Andrejs Erglis,
  • Germanas Marinskis,
  • Joris R. de Groot,
  • Herwig Schmidinger,
  • Manuel Rodriguez Venegas,
  • Michiel Voskuil,
  • Thomas Sturmberger,
  • Jan Petru,
  • Niels Jongejan,
  • Josef Aichinger,
  • Ginta Kamzola,
  • Audrius Aidietis,
  • Laszlo Gellér,
  • Tomas Mraz,
  • Istvan Osztheimer,
  • Yuval Mika,
  • Steven Evans,
  • Daniel Burkhoff,
  • Karl‐Heinz Kuck

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006974
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMany patients requiring a pacemaker have persistent hypertension with systolic blood pressures above recommended levels. We evaluated a pacemaker‐based Programmable Hypertension Control (PHC) therapy that uses a sequence of variably timed shorter and longer atrioventricular intervals. Methods and ResultsPatients indicated for dual‐chamber pacing with office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) >150 mm Hg despite stable medical therapy were implanted with a Moderato™ pulse generator that delivers PHC therapy. Patients were followed for 1 month (Run‐In period) with conventional pacing; those with persistent oSBP >140 mm Hg were included in the study and had PHC therapy activated. The co‐primary efficacy end points were changes in 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure and oSBP between baseline and 3 months. Safety was assessed by tracking adverse events. Thirty‐five patients met the initial inclusion criteria and underwent Moderato implantation. At 1 month, oSBP was <140 mm Hg in 7 patients who were excluded. PHC was activated in the remaining 27 patients with baseline office blood pressure 166±11/80±10 mm Hg despite an average of 3.2 antihypertensive medications. During the Run‐In period, oSBP and 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure decreased by 8±13 and 5±12 mm Hg (P<0.002), respectively. Compared with pre‐PHC activation measurements, oSBP decreased by another 16±15 mm Hg and 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure decreased by an additional 10±13 mm Hg (both P<0.01) at 3 months. No device‐related serious adverse effects were noted. ConclusionsIn pacemaker patients with persistent hypertension despite medical therapy, oSBP and 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure are decreased by PHC therapy. Initial indications are that this therapy is a safe and promising therapy for such patients. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02282033.

Keywords