Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano‐flow cytometry

Abstract

Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano‐flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non‐specific labelling of very low‐density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.

Keywords

• brightness
• extracellular vesicles (EVs)
• fluorescent labelling
• membrane dyes
• nano‐flow cytometry
• single particle characterisation