PLoS ONE (Jan 2011)

Impact of load-related neural processes on feature binding in visuospatial working memory.

  • Nicole A Kochan,
  • Michael Valenzuela,
  • Melissa J Slavin,
  • Stacey McCraw,
  • Perminder S Sachdev,
  • Michael Breakspear

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023960
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 8
p. e23960

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe capacity of visual working memory (WM) is substantially limited and only a fraction of what we see is maintained as a temporary trace. The process of binding visual features has been proposed as an adaptive means of minimising information demands on WM. However the neural mechanisms underlying this process, and its modulation by task and load effects, are not well understood.ObjectiveTo investigate the neural correlates of feature binding and its modulation by WM load during the sequential phases of encoding, maintenance and retrieval.Methods and findings18 young healthy participants performed a visuospatial WM task with independent factors of load and feature conjunction (object identity and position) in an event-related functional MRI study. During stimulus encoding, load-invariant conjunction-related activity was observed in left prefrontal cortex and left hippocampus. During maintenance, greater activity for task demands of feature conjunction versus single features, and for increased load was observed in left-sided regions of the superior occipital cortex, precuneus and superior frontal cortex. Where these effects were expressed in overlapping cortical regions, their combined effect was additive. During retrieval, however, an interaction of load and feature conjunction was observed. This modulation of feature conjunction activity under increased load was expressed through greater deactivation in medial structures identified as part of the default mode network.Conclusions and significanceThe relationship between memory load and feature binding qualitatively differed through each phase of the WM task. Of particular interest was the interaction of these factors observed within regions of the default mode network during retrieval which we interpret as suggesting that at low loads, binding processes may be 'automatic' but at higher loads it becomes a resource-intensive process leading to disengagement of activity in this network. These findings provide new insights into how feature binding operates within the capacity-limited WM system.