Frontiers in Public Health (Apr 2024)

Physiological and psychological recovery in two pure forests: interaction between perception methods and perception durations

  • Xiaogang Sun,
  • Xiaogang Sun,
  • Qinglan Li,
  • Qinglan Li,
  • Xin Zhang,
  • Xin Zhang,
  • Miao Sun,
  • Miao Sun,
  • Jiahui Yin,
  • Jiahui Yin,
  • Jingyi He,
  • Jingyi He,
  • Yige Zhong,
  • Yige Zhong,
  • Wei Ning,
  • Wei Ning

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1296714
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

The forest experience is good for people’s physical and mental health. However, few studies on the effects of pure forest based on the duration and way of experience on people’s physical and mental recovery. In this study, we took 180 first-year college students as research objects and conducted experiments in Pinus sylvestris and Betula platyphylla and the control group of grass plot. The changes of physiological and psychological indexes of the subjects were compared by two perception methods (onsite perception, video perception) and three perception duration (10 min, 20 min, 30 min). The results indicated that: (1) Differences between the two pure forests were mainly reflected in short-term recovery of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and long-term recovery of total mood disorder (TMD). (2) Video perception was more conducive to short-term recovery of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (3) Viewing the Pinus sylvestris for 20 min in different ways was the best way to relieve stress. It is suggested that, Pinus sylvestris can be used as the rehabilitation perception material, and reasonable path length or perception time can be selected for landscape construction in future. These results can provide scientific reference for landscape design based on forest health and environmental perception.

Keywords