Strengths and Challenges of Using iNaturalist in Plant Research with Focus on Data Quality
Eduard López-Guillén,
Ileana Herrera,
Badis Bensid,
Carlos Gómez-Bellver,
Neus Ibáñez,
Pedro Jiménez-Mejías,
Mario Mairal,
Laura Mena-García,
Neus Nualart,
Mònica Utjés-Mascó,
Jordi López-Pujol
Affiliations
Eduard López-Guillén
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Ileana Herrera
Escuela de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Espíritu Santo (UEES), Samborondón 091650, Ecuador
Badis Bensid
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Carlos Gómez-Bellver
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Neus Ibáñez
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Pedro Jiménez-Mejías
Área de Botánica, Departamento de Biología Molecular e Ingeniería Bioquímica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
Mario Mairal
Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución (Unidad de Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Laura Mena-García
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Neus Nualart
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Mònica Utjés-Mascó
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
Jordi López-Pujol
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-CMCNB), 08038 Barcelona, Spain
iNaturalist defines itself as an “online social network of people sharing biodiversity information to help each other learn about nature” and it is likely one of the largest citizen science web portals in the world, as every year millions of observations across thousands of species are gathered and collectively compiled by an engaged community of nearly 3 million users (November 2023). The strengths and potentialities that explain the success of the platform are reviewed and include, among others, its usability and low technical requirements, immediacy, open-access, the possibility of interacting with other users, artificial-intelligence-aided identification, versatility and automatic incorporation of the validated records to GBIF. iNaturalist has, however, features that scientists need to carefully consider when using it for their research, making sure that the quality of observations does not limit or hinder its usefulness in plant research. While these are identified (e.g., the lack of representative photographs for many observations or the relatively frequent identification errors), we provide some suggestions to overcome them and, by doing so, improve the use and add value to iNaturalist for plant research.