Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal (Sep 2016)

Incidence, predictors and outcomes of hematoma after ICD implantation: An analysis of a nationwide database of 85,276 patients

  • Arun Raghav Mahankali Sridhar,
  • Vivek Yarlagadda,
  • Arun Kanmanthareddy,
  • Sravanthi Parasa,
  • Ryan Maybrook,
  • Buddhadeb Dawn,
  • Yeruva Madhu Reddy,
  • Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2016.10.005
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 5
pp. 159 – 164

Abstract

Read online

Background: Pocket hematoma is one of the most common complications following cardiac device implantation. This study examined the impact of this complication on in-hospital outcomes following Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Methods: Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2010 was queried to identify all primary implantations of ICDs and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-D) during the year 2010 using ICD-9 codes. We then identified the patients who experienced a procedure related hematoma during the hospital stay. We compared the outcomes of the patients with and without a hematoma complication. All analyses were performed using SPSS 20 complex samples using appropriate weights to adjust for the complex sampling design of the national database. Results: Out of a total of 85,276 primary ICD implantations in the year 2010, 2233 (2.6% of the implantations) were complicated by a hematoma. Increased age (p < 0.001), and comorbidities such as congestive heart failure (odds ratio (OR) – 1.86, p < 0.001), coagulopathy (OR - 2.3, p < 0.001) and renal failure (OR - 1.52, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of pocket hematoma formation. Patients who developed a hematoma had a longer hospitalization (9.1 days versus 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital costs ($56,545 versus $47,015, p < 0.001) compared to patients who did not have a hematoma. Overall mortality associated with ICD implantation was low (0.6%), and hematoma formation did not adversely affect mortality (0.6% versus 0.4%, p = 0.63). Conclusion: Hematoma occurs infrequently after ICD implantation, however, it adversely impacts the cost of procedure and length of stay.

Keywords