Insights into Imaging (Feb 2024)

O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: pearls and pitfalls

  • Stephanie Nougaret,
  • Leo Razakamanantsoa,
  • Elizabeth A. Sadowski,
  • Erica B. Stein,
  • Yulia Lakhman,
  • Nicole M. Hindman,
  • Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray,
  • Andrea G. Rockall,
  • Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01577-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 18

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In 2021, the American College of Radiology (ACR) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee developed a risk stratification system and lexicon for assessing adnexal lesions using MRI. Like the BI-RADS classification, O-RADS MRI provides a standardized language for communication between radiologists and clinicians. It is essential for radiologists to be familiar with the O-RADS algorithmic approach to avoid misclassifications. Training, like that offered by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), is essential to ensure accurate and consistent application of the O-RADS MRI system. Tools such as the O-RADS MRI calculator aim to ensure an algorithmic approach. This review highlights the key teaching points, pearls, and pitfalls when using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. Critical relevance statement This article highlights the pearls and pitfalls of using the O-RADS MRI scoring system in clinical practice. Key points • Solid tissue is described as displaying post- contrast enhancement. • Endosalpingeal folds, fimbriated end of the tube, smooth wall, or septa are not solid tissue. • Low-risk TIC has no shoulder or plateau. An intermediate-risk TIC has a shoulder and plateau, though the shoulder is less steep compared to outer myometrium. Graphical Abstract

Keywords