Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Sep 2023)

Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical techniques for ventral stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint in dogs

  • Danyelle Rayssa Cintra Ferreira,
  • Luís Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves Dias,
  • Bruno Watanabe Minto,
  • Thiago André Salvitti de Sá Rocha,
  • Caio Afonso dos Santos Malta,
  • Maria Eduarda Bastos Andrade Moutinho da Conceição,
  • Dayvid Vianêis Farias de Lucena

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/acb383223
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 38

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study compared, through biomechanical evaluation under ventral flexion load, four surgical techniques for ventral stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint in dogs. Methods: In total, 28 identical atlantoaxial joint models were created by digital printing from computed tomography images of a dog, and the specimens were divided into four groups of seven. In each group, a different technique for ventral stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint was performed: transarticular lag screws, polyaxial screws, multiple screws and bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate–PMMA), and atlantoaxial plate. After the stabilization technique, biomechanical evaluation was performed under ventral flexion load, both with a predefined constant load and with a gradually increasing load until stabilization failure. Results: All specimens, regardless of stabilization technique, were able to support the predefined load without failing. However, the PMMA method provided significant more rigidity (p ≤ 0.05) and also best resisted the gradual increase in load, supporting a significantly higher maximum force (p ≤ 0.05). There was no statistical difference in flexural strength between the transarticular lag screws and plate groups. The polyaxial screws method was significantly less resistant to loading (p ≤ 0.05) than the other groups. Conclusions: The PMMA technique had biomechanical advantages in ventral atlantoaxial stabilization over the other evaluated methods.

Keywords