Fishes (Feb 2024)

Different Protein Hydrolysates Can Be Used in the <i>Penaeus vannamei</i> (Boone, 1934) Diet as a Partial Replacement for Fish Meal during the Grow-Out Phase

  • Celma Negrini,
  • Caio Henrique do Nascimento Ferreira,
  • Rafael Ortiz Kracizy,
  • Rosane Lopes Ferreira,
  • Luana Cardoso dos Santos,
  • Milena Cia Retcheski,
  • Marlise Teresinha Mauerwerk,
  • Luisa Helena Cazarolli,
  • Wilson Rogério Boscolo,
  • Eduardo Luis Cupertino Ballester

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020073
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 2
p. 73

Abstract

Read online

This study evaluated the inclusion of protein hydrolysates and a commercial product as a partial replacement for fish meals in the diet of Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) during the grow-out phase. A recirculation system with 24 experimental units and a biological filter was used. The experimental design was completely randomized with six treatments: control; chicken protein hydrolysate (CPH); enzymatic hydrolysate of chicken feathers; Aquabite®; CPH + maltodextrin; CPH + yeast; and four replicates. After 50 days, the zootechnical performance and animal welfare parameters, centesimal carcass composition, digestive enzyme activity, and hemocyte count were evaluated. The treatments did not affect the zootechnical performance and total hemocyte count of the animals (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the antenna length indicated that all animals were in good health. The antenna length in treatment T5 was significantly greater (p > 0.05) than that in T4 and similar to that in treatments T3 and T6, demonstrating a positive influence of dietary protein hydrolysates. Concerning animal welfare, dietary protein hydrolysates influenced the length of the antenna (p p p < 0.05). The performance of the animals was satisfactory under all treatments, including enzymatic activity, demonstrating the possibility of using hydrolysates.

Keywords