Echo Research and Practice (Mar 2024)

Validation of machine learning models for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction on point-of-care ultrasound: insights on features that impact performance

  • Christina L. Luong,
  • Mohammad H. Jafari,
  • Delaram Behnami,
  • Yaksh R. Shah,
  • Lynn Straatman,
  • Nathan Van Woudenberg,
  • Leah Christoff,
  • Nancy Gwadry,
  • Nathaniel M. Hawkins,
  • Eric C. Sayre,
  • Darwin Yeung,
  • Michael Tsang,
  • Ken Gin,
  • John Jue,
  • Parvathy Nair,
  • Purang Abolmaesumi,
  • Teresa Tsang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-024-00043-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Machine learning (ML) algorithms can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiography, but their performance on cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not well understood. Objectives We evaluate the performance of an ML model for estimation of LVEF on cardiac POCUS compared with Level III echocardiographers’ interpretation and formal echo reported LVEF. Methods Clinicians at a tertiary care heart failure clinic prospectively scanned 138 participants using hand-carried devices. Video data were analyzed offline by an ML model for LVEF. We compared the ML model's performance with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and echo reported LVEF. Results There were 138 participants scanned, yielding 1257 videos. The ML model generated LVEF predictions on 341 videos. We observed a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between the ML model's predictions and the reference standards (ICC = 0.77–0.84). When comparing LVEF estimates for randomized single POCUS videos, the ICC between the ML model and Level III echocardiographers' estimates was 0.772, and it was 0.778 for videos where quantitative LVEF was feasible. When the Level III echocardiographer reviewed all POCUS videos for a participant, the ICC improved to 0.794 and 0.843 when only accounting for studies that could be segmented. The ML model's LVEF estimates also correlated well with LVEF derived from formal echocardiogram reports (ICC = 0.798). Conclusion Our results suggest that clinician-driven cardiac POCUS produces ML model LVEF estimates that correlate well with expert interpretation and echo reported LVEF.

Keywords