Nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A propensity score matched analysis

Abstract

Background: Regarding the need for mesh fixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP), several studies have found no significant differences in the recurrence rate between patients with and without fixation. Furthermore, there is no report on the outcome of this treatment from Japan. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of nonfixation TEP with those of fixation at our institute. Methods: In May 2016, the nonfixation TEP technique was launched. The fixation group (165 patients) was compared to the nonfixation group (195 patients). Because of the significant bias between the two groups, a propensity score matched analysis was performed (with 109 patients in each group). Moreover, only ordinary cases (with 58 patients in each group) were compared, excluding bilateral, large, and impaction cases. Results: One patient in the nonfixation group experienced recurrence. It was a hernia case with a large orifice. In the fixation group, seroma was more prevalent; however, no differences were observed between the two groups in propensity score matching. In unilateral cases, the nonfixation group had a shorter operation time and stayed in the hospital for a shorter time postoperatively. The ordinary cases, excluding cases of bilateral hernias, large hernias on visual examination, impactions, and large hernial orifices, showed no recurrence or significance in surgical complications. Conclusions: The nonfixation TEP was considered acceptable at least for ordinary hernial cases.

Keywords

• Inguinal hernia
• Mesh fixation
• Nonfixation TEP
• Recurrence
• Total extraperitoneal repair (TEP)