Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine (Jun 2023)

Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review

  • Feng Tang,
  • Yang Zeng,
  • Li Wang,
  • Daishu Yin,
  • Lin Chen,
  • Dan Xie,
  • Jing Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2155
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a congenital malformation syndrome with poor prognosis. It is associated with a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 4p16.3. Adequate knowledge of prenatal phenotypes and proper prenatal counseling are essential for intrauterine diagnosis. Method We retrospectively analyzed 11 prenatal cases of WHS diagnosed using low‐depth whole‐genome sequencing (copy number variation sequencing) performed at our hospital from May 2017 to September 2022 and reviewed their prenatal ultrasound reports in detail. We also analyzed WHS cases (including prenatal and postnatal) with abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings in the published literature over the past 20 years. Results Among the 11 fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of WHS in our hospital, four cases showed abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings, including shrunken kidneys, ventricular septal defect, a small stomach, fetal growth restriction (FGR), enlarged posterior fossa, and soft ultrasonic markers. Our four cases were combined with 114 published WHS cases with prenatal ultrasound abnormalities from other medical institutions. Of the 118 cases, 59.3% (70 of 118) were multiple malformations. The most frequent ultrasound features observed in all 118 cases were FGR (76.3%, 90 of 118), followed by facial anomalies (28.8%, 34 of 118), central nervous system anomalies (27.1%, 32 of 118), and soft ultrasound markers (23.7%, 28 of 118). Other less common phenotypes included cardiac anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), genitourinary anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), increased NT/NF (12.7%, 15 of 118), skeletal anomalies (11.9%, 14 of 118), a single umbilical artery (10.2%, 12 of 118), gastrointestinal anomalies (9.3%, 11 of 118), oligohydramnios (8.5%, 10 of 118), cystic hygroma (5.1%, six of 118), hydrops/pleural effusion/ascites (2.5%, three of 118), and polyhydramnios (2.5%, three of 118). Conclusion This study improved our understanding of the prenatal presentation of WHS by analyzing prenatal ultrasound abnormalities. The timely identification of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities can provide accurate consultation for pregnant women, improve the prenatal detection of WHS, and enable early prenatal management and intervention of WHS.

Keywords