Genetics in Medicine Open (Jan 2024)

The challenges and opportunities of offering and integrating training in clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics: A survey of LGG Fellowship Program Directors

  • Joshua L. Deignan,
  • Vimla Aggarwal,
  • Allen E. Bale,
  • Daniel B. Bellissimo,
  • Jessica K. Booker,
  • Yang Cao,
  • Kristy R. Crooks,
  • Kristen L. Deak,
  • Daniela Del Gaudio,
  • Birgit Funke,
  • Nicole L. Hoppman,
  • Vanessa Horner,
  • Robert B. Hufnagel,
  • Colleen Jackson-Cook,
  • Prasad Koduru,
  • Marco L. Leung,
  • Shibo Li,
  • Pengfei Liu,
  • Minjie Luo,
  • Rong Mao,
  • Heather Mason-Suares,
  • Fady M. Mikhail,
  • Stephen R. Moore,
  • Rizwan C. Naeem,
  • Laura M. Pollard,
  • Elena A. Repnikova,
  • Lina Shao,
  • Brandon M. Shaw,
  • Shashirekha Shetty,
  • Teresa A. Smolarek,
  • Elizabeth Spiteri,
  • Jessica Van Ziffle,
  • Gail H. Vance,
  • Cindy L. Vnencak-Jones,
  • Eli S. Williams

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2
p. 101820

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: The specialty of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics (LGG) was created in 2017 in an effort to reflect the increasing convergence in technologies and approaches between clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics. However, there has not yet been any formal evaluation of the merging of these disciplines and the challenges faced by Program Directors (PDs) tasked with ensuring the successful training of laboratory geneticists under the new model. Methods: An electronic multi-question Qualtrics survey was created and was sent to the PD for each of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited LGG fellowship programs at the time. The data were collected, and the responses were aggregated for each question. Results: All of the responding PDs had started training at least 1 LGG fellow. PDs noted challenges with funding, staff shortages, molecular/cytogenetics content integration, limited total training time, increased remote work, increased sendout testing, and a lack of prior cytogenetics knowledge among incoming fellows. Conclusion: This survey attempted to assess the challenges that LGG PDs have been facing in offering and integrating clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics fellowship training. Common challenges between programs were noted, and a set of 6 concluding comments are provided to facilitate future discussion.

Keywords