Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior (Jan 2024)
Effectiveness of Cilostazol on Cognitive Decline in High-risk Elderly PeOple with Ischemic Stroke Compared to Aspirin or ClopidogrEl (CHOICE): Design and Rationale for a registry-based randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background and Rationale: Currently, there is no medication to prevent post-stroke cognitive decline. Previous studies have suggested that cilostazol may prevent cognitive decline in stroke through mechanisms such as increasing cerebral blood flow and reducing amyloid beta accumulation. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of cilostazol, compared to aspirin or clopidogrel, in preventing cognitive decline in elderly patients with ischemic stroke at high risk of dementia. Study Design: We have designed a multicenter registry-based randomized controlled trial (RRCT), with an open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE) approach. We will recruit patients enrolled in the CRCS-K stroke registry who are at least three months from the onset of ischemic stroke and who meet the following conditions that suggest a high risk of developing dementia: age ≥ 75 years, age between 65 and 74 years and one of the following conditions: [diabetes mellitus, confluent white matter hyperintensities (Fazekas grade 3), medial temporal atrophy (Scheltens visual grade≥ 3), multiple cerebral microbleeds (≥ 5), multiple lacunes (> 5), APOE e4 allele]. Participants will be randomly allocated to either cilostazol (200 mg daily) or a control group receiving aspirin (100–300 mg daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg daily). Cognitive assessments will be performed at baseline, end of follow-up (up to 60 months), and whenever cognitive decline is reported by participants or caregivers. The study will be carried out across 17 centers in South Korea, with a projected enrollment of 2,362 patients. Study outcomes: Our primary outcome measure is the time from baseline to prespecified cognitive decline, defined as a decrease of 3 or more points on the MMSE and an increase of 1.5 or more points on the CDR-SOB. Secondary endpoints encompass changes in MMSE, CDR-SOB, and MoCA scores from baseline to final assessment, incident dementia, and a composite of recurrent stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. As a primary safety assessment, we will analyze the occurrence of major bleeding events. Discussion: We anticipate that the RRCT approach will enable efficient screening of a large cohort of elderly stroke patients at high risk of dementia while ensuring prolonged follow-up at a reasonable cost.