The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2022)

The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER with NICER Background Estimates

  • Tuomo Salmi,
  • Serena Vinciguerra,
  • Devarshi Choudhury,
  • Thomas E. Riley,
  • Anna L. Watts,
  • Ronald A. Remillard,
  • Paul S. Ray,
  • Slavko Bogdanov,
  • Sebastien Guillot,
  • Zaven Arzoumanian,
  • Cecilia Chirenti,
  • Alexander J. Dittmann,
  • Keith C. Gendreau,
  • Wynn C. G. Ho,
  • M. Coleman Miller,
  • Sharon M. Morsink,
  • Zorawar Wadiasingh,
  • Michael T. Wolff

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac983d
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 941, no. 2
p. 150

Abstract

Read online

We report a revised analysis for the radius, mass, and hot surface regions of the massive millisecond pulsar PSR J0740+6620, studied previously with joint fits to NICER and XMM-Newton data by Riley et al. (2021) and Miller et al. (2021). We perform a similar Bayesian estimation for the pulse-profile model parameters, except that instead of fitting simultaneously the XMM-Newton data, we use the best available NICER background estimates to constrain the number of photons detected from the source. This approach eliminates any potential issues in the cross-calibration between these two instruments, providing thus an independent check of the robustness of the analysis. The obtained neutron star parameter constraints are compatible with the already published results, with a slight dependence on how conservative the imposed background limits are. A tighter lower limit causes the inferred radius to increase, and a tighter upper limit causes it to decrease. We also extend the study of the inferred emission geometry to examine the degree of deviation from antipodality of the hot regions. We show that there is a significant offset to an antipodal spot configuration, mainly due to the non-half-cycle azimuthal separation of the two emitting spots. The offset angle from the antipode is inferred to be above 25° with 84% probability. This seems to exclude a centered-dipolar magnetic field in PSR J0740+6620.

Keywords