Research Involvement and Engagement (Nov 2022)

Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma

  • Tiffany Dy,
  • Winifred J. Hamilton,
  • C. Bradley Kramer,
  • Andrea Apter,
  • Jerry A. Krishnan,
  • James W. Stout,
  • Stephen J. Teach,
  • Alex Federman,
  • John Elder,
  • Tyra Bryant-Stephens,
  • Rebecca J. Bruhl,
  • Shawni Jackson,
  • Kaharu Sumino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Plain English summary The goal of comparative clinical effectiveness research is to compare healthcare options and learn which work best for patients depending on their preferences and circumstances. Research efforts can be more effective when researchers engage stakeholders, such as patients, healthcare providers, and other members of the community—especially those communities or groups targeted by the planned research. Stakeholders can give their input throughout the research process to make sure the study will address questions and concerns that are most important and useful for participants. In 2014, the PCORI funded eight research studies that evaluated various ways to help African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos with poorly controlled asthma. These groups are underrepresented in asthma research but have higher rates of and more severe asthma for reasons that are poorly understood. The goal of this report is to show how stakeholders—including patients with asthma from these underrepresented groups, healthcare providers who care for patients with asthma, key representatives from the communities and others—participated as full partners in the eight studies and helped to improve the overall quality of the research and the relationship between the researchers and the community.

Keywords