Scientific Reports (May 2023)

Using single nucleotide polymorphism array for prenatal diagnosis in a large multicenter study in Southern China

  • Meiying Cai,
  • Na Lin,
  • Nan Guo,
  • Linjuan Su,
  • Xiaoqing Wu,
  • Xiaorui Xie,
  • Ying Li,
  • Shuqiong He,
  • Xianguo Fu,
  • Liangpu Xu,
  • Hailong Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33668-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Numerous studies have evaluated the use of single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) in prenatal diagnostics, but very few have evaluated its application under different risk conditions. Here, SNP-array was used for the retrospective analysis of 8386 pregnancies and the cases were categorized into seven groups. Pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) were found in 699 (8.3%, 699/8386) cases. Among the seven different risk factor groups, the non-invasive prenatal testing-positive group had the highest pCNVs rate (35.3%), followed by the abnormal ultrasound structure group (12.8%), and then the chromosomal abnormalities in the couples group (9.5%). Notably the adverse pregnancy history group presented with the lowest pCNVs rate (2.8%). Further evaluation of the 1495 cases with ultrasound abnormalities revealed that the highest pCNV rates were recorded in those cases with multiple system structure abnormalities (22.6%), followed by the groups with skeletal system (11.6%) and urinary system abnormalities (11.2%). A total of 3424 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers were classified as having one, two, or three ultrasonic soft markers. The different pCNV rates in the three groups were statistically significant. There was little correlation between pCNVs and a previous history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting that genetic screening under these conditions should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.