PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study.

  • Martijn Sijbom,
  • Karolina K Braun,
  • Frederike L Büchner,
  • Leti van Bodegom-Vos,
  • Bart J C Hendriks,
  • Mark G J de Boer,
  • Mattijs E Numans,
  • Merel M C Lambregts

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266473
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 4
p. e0266473

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundApproximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2nd choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of efficacy, increased toxicity and antibiotic resistance. To improve registration, a better understanding is needed of how incorrect labels are attributed.ObjectiveTo investigate the quality of antibiotic allergy registration in primary care and identify determinants to improve registration of antibiotic allergies.DesignRegistration of antibiotic allergies in primary care practices were analysed for 1) completeness and 2) correctness. To identify determinants for improvement, semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers from four healthcare domains were conducted.ParticipantsA total of 300 antibiotic allergy registrations were analysed for completeness and correctness. Thirty-four healthcare providers were interviewed.Main measuresA registration was defined as complete when it included a description of all symptoms, time to onset of symptoms and the duration of symptoms. It was defined as correct when the conclusion was concordant with the Salden criteria. Determinants of correct antibiotic allergy registrations were divided into facilitators or obstructers.Key resultsRates of completeness and correctness of registrations were 0% and 29.3%, respectively. The main perceived barriers for correct antibiotic allergy registration were insufficient knowledge, lack of priority, limitations of registration features in electronic medical records (EMR), fear of medical liability and patients interpreting side-effects as allergies.ConclusionsThe quality of antibiotic allergy registrations can be improved. Potential interventions include raising awareness of the consequences of incomplete and the importance of correct registrations, by continued education, and above all simplifying registration in an EMR by adequate ICT support.