PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Repeatability and agreement of white-to-white measurements between slit-scanning tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating Scheimpflug camera/Placido disc tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

  • Alexander Buckenham Boyle,
  • Soobin Namkung,
  • William Shew,
  • Akilesh Gokul,
  • Charles N J McGhee,
  • Mohammed Ziaei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254832
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 7
p. e0254832

Abstract

Read online

PurposeTo assess the agreement and repeatability of horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) or white-to-white (WTW) measurements between four imaging modalities; combination slit scanning elevation/Placido tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating scheimpflug camera/Placido tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).MethodsA prospective study of 35 right eyes of healthy volunteers were evaluated using the Orbscan IIz, IOL Master 700, Galilei G2, and DRI Triton OCT devices. The inter-device agreement and repeatability of HVID/WTW measurements for each device were analysed.ResultsMean HVID/WTW values obtained by the Orbscan IIz, IOL Master 700, Galilei G2 and DRI Triton OCT were 11.77 ± 0.40 mm, 12.40 ± 0.43 mm, 12.25 ± 0.42 mm, and 12.42 ± 0.47 mm, respectively. All pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in mean HVID/WTW measurements (p = ConclusionsThe four devices exhibit high repeatability, but should not be used interchangeably for HVID/WTW measurements in clinical practice.