Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (Apr 2024)

Personalized cardiovascular risk assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients using circulating molecular profiles and their modulation by TNFi, IL6Ri, and JAKinibs

  • Laura Muñoz-Barrera,
  • Carlos Perez-Sanchez,
  • Rafaela Ortega-Castro,
  • Sagrario Corrales,
  • Maria Luque-Tevar,
  • Tomás Cerdó,
  • Ismael Sanchez-Pareja,
  • Pilar Font,
  • Raquel Lopez-Mejías,
  • Jerusalem Calvo,
  • M.Carmen Abalos-Aguilera,
  • Desiree Ruiz-Vilchez,
  • Pedro Segui,
  • Christian Merlo,
  • José Perez-Venegas,
  • Ma Dolores Ruiz Montesino,
  • Carlos Rodriguez- Escalera,
  • Carmen Romero Barco,
  • Antonio Fernandez-Nebro,
  • Natalia Mena Vazque,
  • Jose Luis Marenco,
  • Julia Uceda Montañes,
  • Javier Godoy-Navarrete,
  • Alba Ma Cabezas-Lucena,
  • Eduardo Collantes Estevez,
  • Ma Angeles Aguirre,
  • Miguel A. González-Gay,
  • Nuria Barbarroja,
  • Alejandro Escudero-Contreras,
  • Chary Lopez-Pedrera

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 173
p. 116357

Abstract

Read online

Background & objectives: This study aimed to: 1) analyze the inflammatory profile of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients, identifying clinical phenotypes associated with cardiovascular (CV) risk; 2) evaluate biologic and targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-DMARDs and ts-DMARDs’: TNFi, IL6Ri, JAKinibs) effects; and 3) characterize molecular mechanisms in immune-cell activation and endothelial dysfunction. Patients & methods: A total of 387 RA patients and 45 healthy donors were recruited, forming three cohorts: i) 208 RA patients with established disease but without previous CV events; ii) RA-CVD: 96 RA patients with CV events, and iii) 83 RA patients treated with b-DMARDs/ts-DMARDs for 6 months. Serum inflammatory profiles (cytokines/chemokines/growth factors) and NETosis/oxidative stress-linked biomolecules were evaluated. Mechanistic in vitro studies were performed on monocytes, neutrophils and endothelial cells (EC). Results: In the first RA-cohort, unsupervised clustering unveiled three distinct groups: cluster 3 (C3) displayed the highest inflammatory profile, significant CV-risk score, and greater atheroma plaques prevalence. In contrast, cluster 1 (C1) exhibited the lowest inflammatory profile and CV risk score, while cluster 2 (C2) displayed an intermediate phenotype. Notably, 2nd cohort RA-CVD patients mirrored C3's inflammation.Treatment with b-DMARDs or ts-DMARDs effectively reduced disease-activity scores (DAS28) and restored normal biomolecules levels, controlling CV risk. In vitro, serum from C3-RA or RA-CVD patients increased neutrophils activity and CV-related protein levels in cultured monocytes and EC, which were partially prevented by pre-incubation with TNFi, IL6Ri, and JAKinibs. Conclusions: Overall, analyzing circulating molecular profiles in RA patients holds potential for personalized clinical management, addressing CV risk and assisting healthcare professionals in tailoring treatment, ultimately improving outcomes.

Keywords