BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (Oct 2024)

Associations of inflammation related prenatal adversities with neurodevelopment of offspring in one year: a longitudinal prospective birth cohort study

  • Ming Gan,
  • Xianxian Zhu,
  • Weiting Wang,
  • Kan Ye,
  • Yangqian Jiang,
  • Tao Jiang,
  • Hong Lv,
  • Qun Lu,
  • Rui Qin,
  • Shiyao Tao,
  • Lei Huang,
  • Xin Xu,
  • Cong Liu,
  • Yuanyan Dou,
  • Kang Ke,
  • Tianyu Sun,
  • Yuxin Liu,
  • Yue Jiang,
  • Xiumei Han,
  • Guangfu Jin,
  • Hongxia Ma,
  • Hongbing Shen,
  • Zhibin Hu,
  • Yichun Guan,
  • Yuan Lin,
  • Jiangbo Du

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06839-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The recent Maternal Immune Activation (MIA) theory suggests maternal systemic inflammation may serve as a mediator in associations between prenatal maternal adversities and neurodevelopmental diseases in offspring. Given the co-exposure to multiple adversities may be experienced by pregnant person, it is unclear whether a quantitative index can be developed to characterize the inflammation related exposure level, and whether this index is associated with neurodevelopmental delays in offspring. Methods Based on Jiangsu Birth Cohort (JBC), a total of 3051 infants were included in the analysis. Inflammation related Prenatal Adversity Index (IPAI) was constructed using maternal data. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition, screening test in one year. Multivariate linear regression and Poisson regression model were performed to analyze the associations between IPAI and neurodevelopment in offspring. Results Compared with “low IPAI” group, offspring with “high IPAI” have lower scores of cognition, receptive communication, expressive communication, and fine motor. The adjusted β were − 0.23 (95%CI: -0.42, -0.04), -0.47 (95%CI: -0.66, -0.28), -0.30 (95%CI: -0.49, -0.11), and − 0.20 (95%CI: -0.33, -0.06). Additionally, the elevated risk for noncompetent development of cognition and receptive communication among “high IPAI” group was observed. The relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] were 1.35 (1.01, 1.69) and 1.37 (1.09, 1.72). Conclusions Our results revealed a significant association between higher IPAI and lower scores across cognition, receptive communication, expressive communication, and fine motor domains, and an increased risk of noncompetent development in the cognition and receptive communication domains.

Keywords